↓ Skip to main content

Importance of Achromatic Contrast in Short-Range Fruit Foraging of Primates

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
126 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Importance of Achromatic Contrast in Short-Range Fruit Foraging of Primates
Published in
PLOS ONE, October 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0003356
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chihiro Hiramatsu, Amanda D. Melin, Filippo Aureli, Colleen M. Schaffner, Misha Vorobyev, Yoshifumi Matsumoto, Shoji Kawamura

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
United States 2 2%
Austria 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 117 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 21%
Student > Master 24 19%
Researcher 20 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 21 17%
Unknown 13 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 62 49%
Psychology 11 9%
Environmental Science 10 8%
Computer Science 8 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 14 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2008.
All research outputs
#5,865,725
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#73,398
of 198,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,797
of 90,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#190
of 400 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,773 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 400 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.