You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolution of Skull and Mandible Shape in Cats (Carnivora: Felidae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0002807 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Per Christiansen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 410 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 8 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 1% |
| United States | 3 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Turkey | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Bulgaria | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 10 | 2% |
| Unknown | 374 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 85 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 59 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 12% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Other | 85 | 21% |
| Unknown | 52 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 229 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 38 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 36 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 6% |
| Unknown | 69 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,739,851
of 24,473,185 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#21,720
of 211,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,293
of 88,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#62
of 464 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,473,185 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 464 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.