You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Political Gender Gap: Gender Bias in Facial Inferences that Predict Voting Behavior
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0003666 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joan Y. Chiao, Nicholas E. Bowman, Harleen Gill |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 10% |
| Spain | 2 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 76% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 147 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 14% |
| Unknown | 36 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 51 | 33% |
| Social Sciences | 36 | 23% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 12% |
| Unknown | 36 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#701,310
of 25,552,205 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#9,350
of 222,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,461
of 105,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#20
of 382 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,205 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,071 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 382 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.