You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
microRNA Target Predictions across Seven Drosophila Species and Comparison to Mammalian Targets
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, June 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dominic Grün, Yi-Lu Wang, David Langenberger, Kristin C Gunsalus, Nikolaus Rajewsky |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 315 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 2% |
| Unknown | 286 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 75 | 24% |
| Researcher | 71 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 39 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 27 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 6% |
| Other | 60 | 19% |
| Unknown | 23 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 170 | 54% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 72 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 12 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 28 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2011.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#8,208
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,831
of 67,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#8
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 67,472 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.