↓ Skip to main content

Chinese herbal medicine for chronic neck pain due to cervical degenerative disc disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chinese herbal medicine for chronic neck pain due to cervical degenerative disc disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2010
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd006556.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xuejun Cui, Kien Trinh, Yong-Jun Wang

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Master 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Unknown 22 79%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 14%
Psychology 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Unknown 22 79%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2016.
All research outputs
#3,639,775
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#5,979
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,610
of 262,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#99
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.