↓ Skip to main content

Systematic review reveals limitations of studies evaluating health-related quality of life after potentially curative treatment for esophageal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Quality of Life Research, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systematic review reveals limitations of studies evaluating health-related quality of life after potentially curative treatment for esophageal cancer
Published in
Quality of Life Research, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11136-012-0290-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc Jacobs, Rhiannon C. Macefield, Jane M. Blazeby, Ida J. Korfage, Mark I. van Berge Henegouwen, Hanneke C. J. M. de Haes, Ellen M. Smets, Mirjam A. G. Sprangers

Abstract

To (1) assess the quality of studies evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQL) after potentially curative treatment for esophageal cancer, and (2) to identify high-quality studies that provide robust HRQL results.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 3%
Unknown 32 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 27%
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 15%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 36%
Psychology 9 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Social Sciences 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Other 4 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2012.
All research outputs
#3,600,537
of 4,508,612 outputs
Outputs from Quality of Life Research
#530
of 676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,326
of 81,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Quality of Life Research
#25
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,508,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 676 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.