You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A North American Yersinia pestis Draft Genome Sequence: SNPs and Phylogenetic Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0000220 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeffrey W. Touchman, David M. Wagner, Jicheng Hao, Stephen D. Mastrian, Maulik K. Shah, Amy J. Vogler, Christopher J. Allender, Erin A. Clark, Debbie S. Benitez, David J. Youngkin, Jessica M. Girard, Raymond K. Auerbach, Stephen M. Beckstrom-Sternberg, Paul Keim |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 28% |
| Researcher | 10 | 22% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 6 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 29 | 63% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2018.
All research outputs
#3,992,430
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#59,803
of 198,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,651
of 77,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#62
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.