You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Plant Carbohydrate Scavenging through TonB-Dependent Receptors: A Feature Shared by Phytopathogenic and Aquatic Bacteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0000224 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Servane Blanvillain, Damien Meyer, Alice Boulanger, Martine Lautier, Catherine Guynet, Nicolas Denancé, Jacques Vasse, Emmanuelle Lauber, Matthieu Arlat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Guadeloupe | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 218 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 210 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 53 | 24% |
| Researcher | 46 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 13% |
| Unknown | 38 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 103 | 47% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 43 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 13 | 6% |
| Unknown | 41 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,269,470
of 23,507,888 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#28,562
of 201,325 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,285
of 77,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#31
of 149 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,507,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,325 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 77,181 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 149 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.