You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The +4G Site in Kozak Consensus Is Not Related to the Efficiency of Translation Initiation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0000188 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xuhua Xia |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Romania | 1 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 33 | 79% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 40% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 24 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 4 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2007.
All research outputs
#5,713,506
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#71,756
of 198,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,411
of 162,349 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#78
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 162,349 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.