You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Shaping Leg Muscles in Drosophila: Role of ladybird, a Conserved Regulator of Appendicular Myogenesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0000122 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tariq Maqbool, Cedric Soler, Teresa Jagla, Malgorzata Daczewska, Neha Lodha, Sudhir Palliyil, K. VijayRaghavan, Krzysztof Jagla |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 77 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 25% |
| Researcher | 13 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Professor | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 24% |
| Unknown | 5 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,057,288
of 23,572,509 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#62,545
of 201,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,285
of 159,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#59
of 139 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,572,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 139 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.