↓ Skip to main content

Selection for Heterozygosity Gives Hope to a Wild Population of Inbred Wolves

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
126 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Selection for Heterozygosity Gives Hope to a Wild Population of Inbred Wolves
Published in
PLOS ONE, December 2006
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0000072
Pubmed ID
Authors

Staffan Bensch, Henrik Andrén, Bengt Hansson, Hans Chr. Pedersen, Håkan Sand, Douglas Sejberg, Petter Wabakken, Mikael Åkesson, Olof Liberg

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Czechia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 206 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 60 27%
Student > Master 31 14%
Student > Bachelor 31 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 13%
Other 11 5%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 24 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 136 61%
Environmental Science 21 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 1%
Other 9 4%
Unknown 30 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2015.
All research outputs
#2,141,535
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#27,068
of 198,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,295
of 158,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#29
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 198,987 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.