You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Robust Time Estimation Reconciles Views of the Antiquity of Placental Mammals
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0000384 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yasuhiro Kitazoe, Hirohisa Kishino, Peter J. Waddell, Noriaki Nakajima, Takahisa Okabayashi, Teruaki Watabe, Yoshiyasu Okuhara |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 10% |
| Other | 15 | 19% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 46 | 57% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 10 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 5 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2023.
All research outputs
#2,494,041
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#31,559
of 201,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,818
of 75,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#33
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,127 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 75,150 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.