You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dynamics of Alliance Formation and the Egalitarian Revolution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, October 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0003293 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sergey Gavrilets, Edgar A. Duenez-Guzman, Michael D. Vose |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 153 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 34 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 64 | 38% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 19% |
| Psychology | 15 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 August 2017.
All research outputs
#983,536
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#13,213
of 199,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,115
of 90,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#33
of 406 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 406 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.