↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Hookworm Infection on Wheat Challenge in Celiac Disease – A Randomised Double-Blinded Placebo Controlled Trial

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
190 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
209 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of Hookworm Infection on Wheat Challenge in Celiac Disease – A Randomised Double-Blinded Placebo Controlled Trial
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0017366
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. James Daveson, Dianne M. Jones, Soraya Gaze, Henry McSorley, Andrew Clouston, Andrew Pascoe, Sharon Cooke, Richard Speare, Graeme A. Macdonald, Robert Anderson, James S. McCarthy, Alex Loukas, John Croese

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 2 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 204 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 14%
Student > Master 29 14%
Researcher 25 12%
Other 16 8%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 46 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 43 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 20 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 2%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 50 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2018.
All research outputs
#2,823,154
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#36,379
of 199,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,824
of 109,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#312
of 1,391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.