You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Accurate and Rapid Estimation of Phosphene Thresholds (REPT)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0022342 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arman Abrahamyan, Colin W. G. Clifford, Manuela Ruzzoli, Dan Phillips, Ehsan Arabzadeh, Justin A. Harris |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 32 | 30% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2012.
All research outputs
#15,144,403
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#128,102
of 199,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,175
of 120,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,406
of 2,215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.