You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Positive Selection in East Asians for an EDAR Allele that Enhances NF-κB Activation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0002209 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jarosław Bryk, Emilie Hardouin, Irina Pugach, David Hughes, Rainer Strotmann, Mark Stoneking, Sean Myles |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 76 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 25% |
| Researcher | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 15 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2020.
All research outputs
#2,642,941
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#32,977
of 201,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,779
of 83,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#87
of 350 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 350 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.