You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Chapter title |
Zombie Swarms: An Investigation on the Behaviour of Your Undead Relatives
|
|---|---|
| Chapter number | 18 |
| Book title |
Fun with Algorithms
|
| Published in |
Lecture notes in computer science, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/978-3-319-07890-8_18 |
| Book ISBNs |
978-3-31-907889-2, 978-3-31-907890-8
|
| Authors |
Vincenzo Gervasi, Giuseppe Prencipe, Valerio Volpi |
| Editors |
Alfredo Ferro, Fabrizio Luccio, Peter Widmayer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 50% |
| France | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2014.
All research outputs
#4,540,710
of 25,342,911 outputs
Outputs from Lecture notes in computer science
#971
of 8,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,903
of 234,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lecture notes in computer science
#13
of 166 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,342,911 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 234,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 166 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.