↓ Skip to main content

The Effect of Interpersonal Psychotherapy and other Psychodynamic Therapies versus ‘Treatment as Usual’ in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Effect of Interpersonal Psychotherapy and other Psychodynamic Therapies versus ‘Treatment as Usual’ in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019044
Pubmed ID
Authors

Janus Christian Jakobsen, Jane Lindschou Hansen, Erik Simonsen, Christian Gluud

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Australia 1 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 106 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Researcher 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 9 8%
Other 21 18%
Unknown 18 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 52 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 4%
Social Sciences 3 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 18 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,399,617
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#89,595
of 199,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,806
of 111,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#702
of 1,500 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,500 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.