You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Electrical Impedance of Acupuncture Meridians: The Relevance of Subcutaneous Collagenous Bands
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2010
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0011907 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Andrew C. Ahn, Min Park, Jessica R. Shaw, Claire A. McManus, Ted J. Kaptchuk, Helene M. Langevin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 108 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 23 | 20% |
Student > Master | 15 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
Other | 7 | 6% |
Other | 28 | 25% |
Unknown | 19 | 17% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 43% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
Engineering | 5 | 4% |
Psychology | 4 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 16% |
Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2019.
All research outputs
#2,438,580
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#30,894
of 199,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,091
of 95,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#152
of 754 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 754 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.