You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Computational Clonal Analysis of the Developing Mouse Limb Bud
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, February 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001071 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luciano Marcon, Carlos G. Arqués, Miguel S. Torres, James Sharpe |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 33 | 35% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 5 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 52 | 56% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 13% |
| Engineering | 9 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2017.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#4,994
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,816
of 194,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#24
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.