You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of early intensive multifactorial therapy on 5-year cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes detected by screening (ADDITION-Europe): a cluster-randomised trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60698-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon J Griffin, Knut Borch-Johnsen, Melanie J Davies, Kamlesh Khunti, Guy EHM Rutten, Annelli Sandbæk, Stephen J Sharp, Rebecca K Simmons, Maureen van den Donk, Nicholas J Wareham, Torsten Lauritzen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 5 | 19% |
| Japan | 2 | 7% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
| Scientists | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 1% |
| Unknown | 373 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 64 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 48 | 12% |
| Other | 40 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 8% |
| Other | 91 | 23% |
| Unknown | 71 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 218 | 55% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 3% |
| Other | 48 | 12% |
| Unknown | 84 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2021.
All research outputs
#1,142,962
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#8,539
of 42,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,636
of 127,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#63
of 469 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,022 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 469 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.