You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Boltzmann Energy-based Image Analysis Demonstrates that Extracellular Domain Size Differences Explain Protein Segregation at Immune Synapses
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002076 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nigel J. Burroughs, Karsten Köhler, Vladimir Miloserdov, Michael L. Dustin, P. Anton van der Merwe, Daniel M. Davis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Czechia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 55 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 36% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 4 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 15% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 5 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 7% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2011.
All research outputs
#17,313,103
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#7,488
of 8,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,563
of 130,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#47
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.