You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Examining the Evidence for Chytridiomycosis in Threatened Amphibian Species
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0023150 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew Heard, Katherine F. Smith, Kelsey Ripp |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 22% |
| Researcher | 22 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 27 | 23% |
| Unknown | 9 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 69 | 59% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2014.
All research outputs
#1,826,781
of 25,364,653 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#22,408
of 220,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,910
of 125,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#230
of 2,350 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,364,653 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 220,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,350 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.