You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Analysis of the Waggle Dance Motion of Honeybees for the Design of a Biomimetic Honeybee Robot
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0021354 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tim Landgraf, Raúl Rojas, Hai Nguyen, Fabian Kriegel, Katja Stettin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 43% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 14% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 5 | 5% |
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 100 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 17% |
| Researcher | 18 | 17% |
| Professor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 17% |
| Unknown | 15 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 33% |
| Computer Science | 13 | 12% |
| Engineering | 12 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2022.
All research outputs
#957,097
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#12,846
of 201,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,884
of 121,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#131
of 2,341 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 201,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,341 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.