You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimation of Daily Energy Expenditure in Pregnant and Non-Pregnant Women Using a Wrist-Worn Tri-Axial Accelerometer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0022922 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vincent T. van Hees, Frida Renström, Antony Wright, Anna Gradmark, Michael Catt, Kong Y. Chen, Marie Löf, Les Bluck, Jeremy Pomeroy, Nicholas J. Wareham, Ulf Ekelund, Søren Brage, Paul W. Franks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 269 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 256 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 55 | 20% |
| Researcher | 44 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 16% |
| Unknown | 60 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 18% |
| Sports and Recreations | 31 | 12% |
| Engineering | 22 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 20% |
| Unknown | 78 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2011.
All research outputs
#15,674,939
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#135,102
of 199,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,953
of 120,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,478
of 2,282 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,282 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.