You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Decelerating Spread of West Nile Virus by Percolation in a Heterogeneous Urban Landscape
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLoS Computational Biology, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002104 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krisztian Magori, Waheed I. Bajwa, Sarah Bowden, John M. Drake |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 3 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Thailand | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 28 | 35% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2011.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#8,207
of 8,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,383
of 130,276 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#57
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,276 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.