↓ Skip to main content

Using Ribosomal Protein Genes as Reference: A Tale of Caution

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
178 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using Ribosomal Protein Genes as Reference: A Tale of Caution
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2008
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0001854
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lieven Thorrez, Katrijn Van Deun, Léon-Charles Tranchevent, Leentje Van Lommel, Kristof Engelen, Kathleen Marchal, Yves Moreau, Iven Van Mechelen, Frans Schuit

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
United Kingdom 4 3%
Mexico 2 1%
Belgium 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 135 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 22%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 8 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 85 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 11 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,131,716
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#86,127
of 199,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,447
of 82,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#167
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.