You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Using Ribosomal Protein Genes as Reference: A Tale of Caution
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2008
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001854 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lieven Thorrez, Katrijn Van Deun, Léon-Charles Tranchevent, Leentje Van Lommel, Kristof Engelen, Kathleen Marchal, Yves Moreau, Iven Van Mechelen, Frans Schuit |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
Mexico | 2 | 1% |
Belgium | 2 | 1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Sweden | 1 | <1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Other | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 135 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 42 | 27% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 22% |
Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 6% |
Other | 29 | 19% |
Unknown | 8 | 5% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 85 | 56% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 27 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 7% |
Neuroscience | 4 | 3% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 13 | 8% |
Unknown | 11 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2021.
All research outputs
#7,131,716
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#86,127
of 199,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,447
of 82,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#167
of 298 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 82,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 298 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.