You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Possible Role for Integrin Signaling in Diffuse Axonal Injury
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0022899 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew A. Hemphill, Borna E. Dabiri, Sylvain Gabriele, Lucas Kerscher, Christian Franck, Josue A. Goss, Patrick W. Alford, Kevin Kit Parker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Denmark | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 5% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 172 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 22% |
| Researcher | 36 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 22% |
| Unknown | 25 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 41 | 22% |
| Engineering | 40 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 377. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2016.
All research outputs
#70,580
of 23,292,144 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#1,181
of 199,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#208
of 120,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#6
of 2,215 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,292,144 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,215 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.