You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
CD8+ T Cells and IFN-γ Mediate the Time-Dependent Accumulation of Infected Red Blood Cells in Deep Organs during Experimental Cerebral Malaria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0018720 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carla Claser, Benoît Malleret, Sin Yee Gun, Alicia Yoke Wei Wong, Zi Wei Chang, Pearline Teo, Peter Chi Ee See, Shanshan Wu Howland, Florent Ginhoux, Laurent Rénia |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 18 | 19% |
| Researcher | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 12% |
| Professor | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 38% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 23 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 8 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2011.
All research outputs
#15,675,797
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#135,103
of 199,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,032
of 110,331 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,143
of 1,480 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,331 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,480 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.