You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Detection of Large Numbers of Novel Sequences in the Metatranscriptomes of Complex Marine Microbial Communities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, August 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0003042 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jack A. Gilbert, Dawn Field, Ying Huang, Rob Edwards, Weizhong Li, Paul Gilna, Ian Joint |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 589 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 21 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 1% |
| Germany | 5 | <1% |
| Chile | 5 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 5 | <1% |
| Brazil | 5 | <1% |
| Portugal | 4 | <1% |
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| France | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 26 | 4% |
| Unknown | 506 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 176 | 30% |
| Researcher | 156 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 40 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 4% |
| Other | 80 | 14% |
| Unknown | 47 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 340 | 58% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 58 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 56 | 10% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 20 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 16 | 3% |
| Other | 39 | 7% |
| Unknown | 60 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,619,823
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#20,698
of 199,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,029
of 83,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#59
of 436 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 436 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.