You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Conditional Random Fields for Fast, Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Studies
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0021591 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jim C. Huang, Christopher Meek, Carl Kadie, David Heckerman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 3% |
France | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 36 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 39% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 24% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 11% |
Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 2 | 5% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 39% |
Computer Science | 8 | 21% |
Mathematics | 4 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2011.
All research outputs
#18,131,617
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#151,601
of 199,063 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,317
of 118,040 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,642
of 2,147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,063 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,040 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.