You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Trouble with Bleeding: Risk Factors for Acute Hepatitis C among HIV-Positive Gay Men from Germany—A Case-Control Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0017781 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Axel J. Schmidt, Jürgen K. Rockstroh, Martin Vogel, Matthias An der Heiden, Armin Baillot, Ivanka Krznaric, Doris Radun |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 50% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 18 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 42% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 19 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2015.
All research outputs
#5,684,831
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#71,328
of 199,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,751
of 109,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#546
of 1,391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.