You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What Leads Indians to Participate in Clinical Trials? A Meta-Analysis of Qualitative Studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0010730 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jatin Y. Shah, Amruta Phadtare, Dimple Rajgor, Meenakshi Vaghasia, Shreyasee Pradhan, Hilary Zelko, Ricardo Pietrobon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 22 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 11% |
| Psychology | 8 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 30 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 July 2011.
All research outputs
#15,675,797
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#135,103
of 199,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,465
of 95,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#583
of 694 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 95,547 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 694 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.