You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Recalibrated Molecular Clock and Independent Origins for the Cholera Pandemic Clones
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0004053 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lu Feng, Peter R. Reeves, Ruiting Lan, Yi Ren, Chunxu Gao, Zhemin Zhou, Yan Ren, Jiansong Cheng, Wei Wang, Jianmei Wang, Wubin Qian, Dan Li, Lei Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 30 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 25% |
| Unknown | 15 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 49 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 21 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,982,295
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#39,832
of 199,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,778
of 171,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#104
of 461 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 461 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.