You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bonobos Extract Meaning from Call Sequences
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0018786 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zanna Clay, Klaus Zuberbühler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 30% |
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Malta | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 174 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 18% |
| Researcher | 28 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 13% |
| Professor | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 24 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 77 | 41% |
| Psychology | 33 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 26 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2011.
All research outputs
#1,345,286
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#17,693
of 193,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,588
of 109,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#142
of 1,484 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 193,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,484 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.