You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Multiple Levels of Synergistic Collaboration in Termite Lignocellulose Digestion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0021709 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael E. Scharf, Zachary J. Karl, Amit Sethi, Drion G. Boucias |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 33% |
| Japan | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Puerto Rico | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 139 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 30 | 20% |
| Unknown | 13 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 86 | 57% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 19 | 13% |
| Unknown | 18 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,583,500
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#81,090
of 199,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,954
of 117,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#784
of 2,079 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,014 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,079 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.