↓ Skip to main content

Bonobos Fall within the Genomic Variation of Chimpanzees

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bonobos Fall within the Genomic Variation of Chimpanzees
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0021605
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Fischer, Kay Prüfer, Jeffrey M. Good, Michel Halbwax, Victor Wiebe, Claudine André, Rebeca Atencia, Lawrence Mugisha, Susan E. Ptak, Svante Pääbo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
Germany 3 2%
Spain 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 152 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 40 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 21%
Student > Master 25 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 7%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 15 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 96 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 8%
Social Sciences 8 5%
Psychology 6 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 5 3%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 19 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2022.
All research outputs
#4,694,291
of 25,867,969 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#83,623
of 225,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,788
of 129,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#554
of 2,101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,867,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.