You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High In Situ Repeatability of Behaviour Indicates Animal Personality in the Beadlet Anemone Actinia equina (Cnidaria)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0021963 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mark Briffa, Julie Greenaway |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 3% |
| Unknown | 193 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 16% |
| Researcher | 33 | 16% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 11% |
| Unknown | 33 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 130 | 61% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 10% |
| Psychology | 6 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 41 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 119. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2022.
All research outputs
#357,875
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#5,069
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,226
of 132,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#52
of 2,180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.