You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unravelling the Mystery of Stem/Progenitor Cells in Human Breast Milk
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0014421 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yiping Fan, Yap Seng Chong, Mahesh A. Choolani, Mark D. Cregan, Jerry K. Y. Chan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Ireland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Panama | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 105 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 27 | 24% |
| Unknown | 21 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2013.
All research outputs
#2,937,109
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#38,471
of 199,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,894
of 183,312 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#250
of 1,104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,312 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.