You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comprehensive Genomic Analysis of a BRCA2 Deficient Human Pancreatic Cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, July 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0021639 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Louise J. Barber, Juan M. Rosa Rosa, Iwanka Kozarewa, Kerry Fenwick, Ioannis Assiotis, Costas Mitsopoulos, David Sims, Jarle Hakas, Marketa Zvelebil, Christopher J. Lord, Alan Ashworth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 3% |
China | 2 | 3% |
Uruguay | 1 | 2% |
France | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 52 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 20 | 34% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
Other | 9 | 16% |
Unknown | 5 | 9% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 32 | 55% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 16% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 3 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,484,400
of 23,294,050 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#31,538
of 199,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,102
of 117,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#356
of 2,132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,294,050 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,062 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,487 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.