You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Inside Out: Modern Imaging Techniques to Reveal Animal Anatomy
|
---|---|
Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2011
|
DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0017879 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Henrik Lauridsen, Kasper Hansen, Tobias Wang, Peter Agger, Jonas L. Andersen, Peter S. Knudsen, Anne S. Rasmussen, Lars Uhrenholt, Michael Pedersen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
France | 1 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 4 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chile | 2 | 2% |
United States | 2 | 2% |
Japan | 2 | 2% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Norway | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Denmark | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 116 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 19% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
Researcher | 11 | 9% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 7% |
Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
Other | 29 | 23% |
Unknown | 27 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 47% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 6% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 3% |
Engineering | 4 | 3% |
Other | 20 | 16% |
Unknown | 26 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2016.
All research outputs
#2,613,155
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#32,510
of 211,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,285
of 112,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#260
of 1,449 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 211,942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 112,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,449 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.