You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Convergence to consensus in heterogeneous groups and the emergence of informal leadership
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Reports, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1038/srep29704 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sergey Gavrilets, Jeremy Auerbach, Mark van Vugt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Japan | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Malta | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 15% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 25 | 20% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 14 | 11% |
| Psychology | 11 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 7% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 29 | 23% |
| Unknown | 30 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,700,145
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#36,534
of 142,708 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,524
of 375,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#918
of 3,690 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 142,708 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,036 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,690 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.