↓ Skip to main content

CORE: A Phylogenetically-Curated 16S rDNA Database of the Core Oral Microbiome

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
217 Mendeley
citeulike
8 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CORE: A Phylogenetically-Curated 16S rDNA Database of the Core Oral Microbiome
Published in
PLOS ONE, April 2011
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0019051
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ann L. Griffen, Clifford J. Beall, Noah D. Firestone, Erin L. Gross, James M. DiFranco, Jori H. Hardman, Bastienne Vriesendorp, Russell A. Faust, Daniel A. Janies, Eugene J. Leys

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 4 2%
Unknown 199 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 49 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 22%
Student > Master 24 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 41 19%
Unknown 25 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 89 41%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 13 6%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 22 10%
Unknown 29 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,528,733
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#135,734
of 225,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,874
of 125,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,124
of 1,536 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,486 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,536 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.