You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fortune Favours the Bold: An Agent-Based Model Reveals Adaptive Advantages of Overconfidence in War
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, June 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0020851 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dominic D. P. Johnson, Nils B. Weidmann, Lars-Erik Cederman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 27% |
| Canada | 2 | 8% |
| Germany | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| San Marino | 1 | 4% |
| Kenya | 1 | 4% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 88% |
| Scientists | 3 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Hungary | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 26% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 11% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 17 | 19% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 16 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 11% |
| Psychology | 9 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 26% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2022.
All research outputs
#1,171,851
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#15,427
of 202,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,888
of 116,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#164
of 1,988 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202,026 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 116,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,988 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.