You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Predatory Functional Morphology in Raptors: Interdigital Variation in Talon Size Is Related to Prey Restraint and Immobilisation Technique
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0007999 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Denver W. Fowler, Elizabeth A. Freedman, John B. Scannella |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 13% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Spain | 1 | 6% |
| Thailand | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 88% |
| Scientists | 2 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 4% |
| Australia | 2 | 1% |
| Argentina | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Slovakia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 176 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 12% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 34 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 93 | 47% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 17 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 40 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 February 2024.
All research outputs
#906,515
of 24,133,587 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#12,079
of 207,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,319
of 172,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#38
of 558 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,133,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 207,394 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 172,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 558 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.