↓ Skip to main content

Motivational interviewing for improving outcomes in youth living with HIV

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
168 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Motivational interviewing for improving outcomes in youth living with HIV
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2012
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009748.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lawrence Mbuagbaw, Chenglin Ye, Lehana Thabane

Abstract

Almost half of all the new HIV infections occur in youth. Motivational interviewing (MI) is a counselling technique that is effective in bringing about positive behavior changes in the general population. It is unclear whether it can be used to improve outcomes in youth living with HIV.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 168 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 163 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 27%
Researcher 28 17%
Unspecified 24 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 13%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Other 37 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 44%
Unspecified 28 17%
Social Sciences 22 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 11%
Psychology 16 10%
Other 10 6%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2014.
All research outputs
#7,230,403
of 12,527,093 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#7,362
of 8,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,545
of 142,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#58
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,527,093 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,923 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 142,455 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.