↓ Skip to main content

Variation in medication use in cancer patients at the end of life: a cross-sectional analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variation in medication use in cancer patients at the end of life: a cross-sectional analysis
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, October 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00520-012-1619-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. J. H. Raijmakers, L. van Zuylen, C. J. Furst, M. Beccaro, L. Maiorana, P. Pilastri, C. Rossi, G. Flego, A. van der Heide, M. Costantini

Abstract

Despite advances in cancer treatment, patients still die with unnecessary suffering. Therefore, high-quality end-of-life care is needed. Variations in medication use at the end of life may suggest areas for improvement. This study aims to describe the use of medications during the last days of life of cancer patients and to explore the possibility of using it as a quality measure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 80 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 19%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Researcher 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 21 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 36%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 24 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2012.
All research outputs
#14,154,868
of 22,684,168 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#2,739
of 4,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,630
of 173,756 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#25
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,684,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,518 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,756 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.