You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Structural Insights into the Evolution of a Non-Biological Protein: Importance of Surface Residues in Protein Fold Optimization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, May 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0000467 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew D. Smith, Matthew A. Rosenow, Meitian Wang, James P. Allen, Jack W. Szostak, John C. Chaput |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 3 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 64 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 20% |
| Chemistry | 10 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 6 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2007.
All research outputs
#4,545,365
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#64,971
of 199,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,944
of 71,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#49
of 132 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 71,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 132 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.