You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Poor Reporting of Scientific Leadership Information in Clinical Trial Registers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001610 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melanie Sekeres, Jennifer L. Gold, An-Wen Chan, Joel Lexchin, David Moher, Marleen L. P. Van Laethem, James Maskalyk, Lorraine Ferris, Nathan Taback, Paula A. Rochon |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 40 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Librarian | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 15 | 34% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 48% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2015.
All research outputs
#4,597,117
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#65,555
of 199,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,440
of 80,977 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#105
of 278 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,977 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 278 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.