You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Singing in the Rain Forest: How a Tropical Bird Song Transfers Information
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, February 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0001580 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicolas Mathevon, Thierry Aubin, Jacques Vielliard, Maria-Luisa da Silva, Frédéric Sebe, Danilo Boscolo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 8 | 3% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 225 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 19% |
| Researcher | 45 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 33 | 13% |
| Other | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 42 | 17% |
| Unknown | 27 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 164 | 66% |
| Environmental Science | 31 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 31 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2016.
All research outputs
#4,064,027
of 23,295,606 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#60,578
of 199,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,982
of 160,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#95
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,295,606 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.